Roberta wrote:
That Occam guy was a pain in the ass. Anyway, I don't think this is an Occam thing. I think this is an eye of the beholder thing. You see a deer with flames. I see a deer with wings. Either way, the sign is goofy. Shouldn't a graphic representation be easy to understand? This sign has two (relatively intelligent) people debating its meaning halfway across the world from each other. As a sign it's a loser. Or as the authors of the book I'm editing would say, it's a looser.
Looser. I grok, sister. At least nobody said it was a dear.....or two dear's.
Hey.....I'.m enjoying the silly debate!
nimh wrote:
I think the sign was manipulated -- ie, the wings were drawn on by some whimster. They're a slightly different shade of black, I think.
SENSE? RATIONALITY?
Deer me.
"Whimster" is way cool, though.
