36
   

OK, I admit it. Sarah Palin is a great pick!

 
 
  2  
Reply Thu 4 Sep, 2008 11:35 pm
Re: DrewDad (Post 3389293)
Is there a way to find out how many that tuned in to hear McCain fell asleep?
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Sep, 2008 11:57 am
Re: ebrown p (Post 3381462)
Sarah Palin is great prick?

Who flung dwong?
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 5 Sep, 2008 12:00 pm
Poor, poor pitiful democrats...
firefly
 
  3  
Reply Fri 5 Sep, 2008 07:52 pm
Re: H2O MAN (Post 3389847)



  0  
Reply Fri 5 Sep, 2008 09:28 pm
Re: H2O MAN (Post 3389847)
Drill, Baby, Drill !

HeeHeeHee.
0 Replies
 
  0  
Reply Sat 6 Sep, 2008 01:00 am
Re: firefly (Post 3390619)
I guess you are A-OK with this disgusting cartoon, and you are a proud feminist.

Can you idiots not understand the distinction between irony and hypocrisy?

You have no compunction about manipulating facts but does that have to extend to the manipulation of our language?

I guess so since you have all subscribed to the Josef Goebbels propoganda theory of The Big Lie: Say it, whether true or not, enough and the proles will eventually believe it.

I am rapidy coming to the conclusion that participation in this forum has no value beyond that which can be internally realized. All the rest is telling the f*cking fools what idiots they are and reading their assurance that I am either a member of, or the singular figure of the "F*cking Fools."
firefly
 
  4  
Reply Sat 6 Sep, 2008 08:08 am
Re: Finn dAbuzz (Post 3390946)
Yes, I am a proud feminist. Which means I feel that women who run for public office should be treated equally with men. That includes being satirized in political cartoons.

Neither cartoon is at all disgusting, neither is inaccurate, and neither is sexist.

The first cartoon points out the very obvious disconnect between Palin's public positions and her personal life, the obvious failings of those public positions, and the fact she is unwilling to address the problems inherent in her positions, even when they they surface in her own family. Her daughter becoming pregnant might be irony, but her failure to comment on how this reflects on the validity of her positions, and her continued advocacy of such positions, does suggest some degree of hypocrisy on her part.

The second cartoon reflects more on McCain than Palin. That he is marketing a woman to attract the supporters of Clinton, despite the fact that this woman opposes almost everything that Clinton stands for, and they have nothing in common beyond gender. Ditto for Palin, in terms of her initial attempts to rally Clinton's supporters by referring to the "18 million cracks in that highest glass ceiling"--using Hillary's own words--suggesting that women, particularly Clinton supporters, should join her in breaking through that ceiling, merely to put a woman in office regardless of where she stands on the issues. The cartoon highlights how ridiculous it is to assume that Hillary's supporters would fall for this nonsense. It does suggest that neither McCain nor Palin give women voters credit for having any brains, or any concern about the issues.

I fail to see how you could find either cartoon disgusting.

I'm sure you don't like what either cartoon points out about Palin or McCain, but sometimes the truth hurts.
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Sep, 2008 09:28 am
Re: firefly (Post 3391097)
Females that are hard core supporters of Mrs. Bill Clinton are a small & scary group of non-feminine women.



0 Replies
 
  3  
Reply Sat 6 Sep, 2008 09:50 am
We all know why Palin's daughter got pregnant, don't we? No sex education.
  2  
Reply Sat 6 Sep, 2008 11:39 am
Re: firefly (Post 3390619)
Do you really want this soccer mom as vp? Or as mccain is very very old...possibly and quite suddenly President and Commander in Chief?

or put it this way, do you really want this gunslinger jesus freak creationist and advocate of the break up of the Union as President?

OK thats fine with me, I thought she was quite nice, and told one or two good jokes.

Do pitbulls really wear lipstick in the US?

  1  
Reply Sat 6 Sep, 2008 11:52 am
Re: cicerone imposter (Post 3391226)
Really ?
U have proof that lack of INFORMATION was the cause ?

Anyway, she is not running for office; her mother is.

I will vote for Mrs. Palin because if she becomes President,
she will be less likely to interfere with my freedom
and even promote its expansion; that 's what I care about.





David
0 Replies
 
  3  
Reply Sat 6 Sep, 2008 12:06 pm
Re: Steve 41oo (Post 3391358)
Quote:
Do you really want this soccer mom as vp?
Or as mccain is very very old...possibly and quite suddenly President and Commander in Chief?

Yes.
She is pro-freedom, and pro-Individualist, as I am.
That 's what America is about: freedom

Quote:
or put it this way,
do you really want this gunslinger jesus freak creationist
and advocate of the break up of the Union as President?

Yes, definitely.
Note that I am not anti-Jesus
and I support government having no jurisdiction
to interfere with any citizen's possession of guns.
Jesus said that if u don t have a sword, u better buy one. Luke 22:36
In this century, that extrapolates to advocacy of gun possession.

Quote:
OK thats fine with me,

That 's the IMPORTANT thing.


Quote:
I thought she was quite nice, and told one or two good jokes.

I 'm glad that u like her.





David
  2  
Reply Sat 6 Sep, 2008 12:48 pm
Re: OmSigDAVID (Post 3391382)
Quote:
I will vote for Mrs. Palin because if she becomes President,
she will be less likely to interfere with my freedom
and even promote its expansion; that 's what I care about.


I care about freedom too, and think that Sarah Palin is quite a person. I agree with many of her ideas. Problem is, by definition, being anti-abortion does interfere with freedom...............maybe not yours, but half the population of the US.
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Sep, 2008 01:52 pm
Re: Phoenix32890 (Post 3391432)
Yes; I cannot deny what u said.
She deviated from the libertarian position on that point; I have not.





David
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  3  
Reply Sat 6 Sep, 2008 01:57 pm
Re: cicerone imposter (Post 3391226)
cicerone imposter wrote:

We all know why Palin's daughter got pregnant, don't we? No sex education.


Maybe it was a lack of sex-ed, but I'm pretty sure the lack of a condom or other birth control method during sex caused the pregnancy.
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Sep, 2008 01:58 pm
Tho I must agree that abortion is an important point,
I believe that voters will need to evaluate whether, on balance,
more freedom will be forthcoming from libertarian conservative Republicans or not.





David
0 Replies
 
  3  
Reply Sat 6 Sep, 2008 02:03 pm
Re: H2O MAN (Post 3391515)
Quote:
cicerone imposter wrote:

We all know why Palin's daughter got pregnant, don't we? No sex education.



Quote:

Maybe it was a lack of sex-ed, but I'm pretty sure the lack of a condom
or other birth control method during sex caused the pregnancy.

Maybe,
but I know a fine fellow in his 30s now,
whose mother told me that his birth resulted from a condom falling off.
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Sep, 2008 02:33 pm
Re: OmSigDAVID (Post 3391524)
H2O after all these years about the failure of condoms still hasn't caught on, but for him, that's to be expected.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  3  
Reply Sat 6 Sep, 2008 02:36 pm
Re: OmSigDAVID (Post 3391524)
OmSigDAVID wrote:

I know a fine fellow in his 30s now, whose mother told me that his birth resulted from a condom falling off.


Do they make them in an extra small size that won't fall off?
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Sep, 2008 09:24 pm
Re: H2O MAN (Post 3391566)
0 Replies
 
 

 
Copyright © 2008 able2know :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 11/20/2008 at 03:33:53 :: Active ingredients: LAMP, XHTML, CSS, JavaScript
Top End