Reply Mon 15 Sep, 2003 10:52 am
Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer is at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by it slef but the wrod as a wlohe.


Do you argee?

Or are tehy plulnig our leg?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link/Embed
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 711 • Replies: 9

 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 Sep, 2003 02:26 pm
To an extent that is correct, they have to be common words you would use in everyday life and there are probably still a few exceptions.
0 Replies
 
Post: # 361,081
View Profile margo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 Sep, 2003 02:31 pm
Yes - you can work it out - but reading is a lot slower.

It's an interesting thought, though - sort of "words as pictures". Slight changes in the picture don't upset the overall understanding?

I've been wondering a bit about this lately!
0 Replies
 
Post: # 361,107
View Profile fresco
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 Sep, 2003 02:48 pm
Good stuff Frank !

Amongst other things this demonstrates active versus passive perception i.e. "facts" are a function of anticipation.
0 Replies
 
Post: # 361,472
View Profile Ceili
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 Sep, 2003 07:34 pm
Frank I have to agree but the words must be in lower case otherwise the theory doesn't work.
0 Replies
 
Post: # 361,479
View Profile Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 Sep, 2003 07:37 pm
bein' dyslexic, it ain't no surprise to me . . . i kin read good . . . real good . . .
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Sep, 2003 03:21 am
I think it's more the fact that we live with so many bad spellers around us (such as myself) that it is second nature to figure out the words as we read them no matter how messed up they are. It has just become easy over time lol
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Sep, 2003 03:41 am
Having a sound knowledge of English helps as well to predict the words from the context in which they were used, and from those on either side. Perhaps this is an extension of margo's point of 'words as pictures' in that certain groups of words are commonly used together.
0 Replies
 
Post: # 361,940
View Profile CodeBorg
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Sep, 2003 04:55 am
Three similar threads:

Sep 12 - congitvie science study
Sep 15 - Qeustion
Sep 16 - Itnersting fcat


[ Sep 18 Edit: And now there's seven!

Sep 12, 7:30pm - congitvie science study
Sep 15, 9:51am - Qeustion
Sep 16, 2:57am - Itnersting fcat
Sep 16, 8:01am - Gotta Love The English Language
Sep 16, 2:53pm - Concerning spelling
Sep 17, 2:13pm - Caillng all Dyslexix
Sep 17, 4:01pm - Reading English

PS -- Search A2K for wrod or ltteers or rghit or oredr. ]
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 Sep, 2003 10:43 am
CodeBorg wrote:
Three similar threads:

Sep 12 - congitvie science study
Sep 15 - Qeustion
Sep 16 - Itnersting fcat


[ Sep 18 Edit: And now there's seven!

Sep 12, 7:30pm - congitvie science study
Sep 15, 9:51am - Qeustion
Sep 16, 2:57am - Itnersting fcat
Sep 16, 8:01am - Gotta Love The English Language
Sep 16, 2:53pm - Concerning spelling
Sep 17, 2:13pm - Caillng all Dyslexix
Sep 17, 4:01pm - Reading English

PS -- Search A2K for wrod or ltteers or rghit or oredr. ]



Jeez, Code, ya really know how to hurt a guy!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Lovatts - Question by margaret schwerin
1001 Ways to Call Someone "Stupid." - Discussion by DrewDad
Post about the one before you - Discussion by Green Army Sniper
Where am I - Travel Game II. - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
Neverending Connect the Book Title Game - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Lovatts Holiday Collection No.71 - Question by geminikaren
lovatts cryptic 218 - Question by sandray
What is this context? - Question by sophocles
Mensa type question - Question by sophocles
Wordplay - Question by sophocles
Lovatts Baffler No 83 - Question by smithy
 
  1. able2know
  2. » Qeustion
Copyright © 2010 Horizontal Verticals :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 02/09/2010 at 12:25:25 Top End