2
   

A Taxonomy of A2K Liberals :-)

 
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2008 08:28 am
I wasn't referring to usage of "yellow dog” in relation to Democrats but to the term generally. Embarrassed
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2008 08:29 am
Shocked
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2008 08:32 am
Rockhead wrote:
:shock:


See my (linked) response on the previous page.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2008 01:18 pm
All of us infestested with utmost ignorance.
Am I wrong?
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2008 01:22 pm
Claiming others are ignorants without even knowing them is really ignorant.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2008 03:05 pm
Yellow Dog just means you'd vote for a yellow dog before you'd vote for a Republican.

Trust me...nothing sinister. Jeez, I was raised on this...
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2008 03:07 pm
Rama-lama-ding-dong wrote:
Am I wrong?


Always.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2008 03:09 pm
you are so infestested!
0 Replies
 
hanno
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2008 08:10 pm
dyslexia wrote:
no anarchists?


I'm conservative-flavored. I'm thinking between Zealot/Snob, I mean, not literally as such, but thats where ya got the rest of the fightin' breed.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2008 09:26 pm
well yes of course, zealot/snob is the real me but i try to hide it under my red neck.
0 Replies
 
Diane
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2008 09:48 pm
Snood, don't feel bad about not being included in the 'angry men' category. I think being married has mellowed you into a nice, but uncompromising reasonable man.

She must be very good for you. :wink:
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2008 10:41 pm
Diane wrote:
Snood, don't feel bad about not being included in the 'angry men' category. I think being married has mellowed you into a nice, but uncompromising reasonable man.

She must be very good for you. :wink:


Wink is right....
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2008 10:46 pm
Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 May, 2008 08:00 am
maporsche wrote:
Diane wrote:
Snood, don't feel bad about not being included in the 'angry men' category. I think being married has mellowed you into a nice, but uncompromising reasonable man.

She must be very good for you. :wink:


Wink is right....



Aw, maporsche... ya just can't let it go, can ya?
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 May, 2008 10:00 am
Wow, just realized that I was left off of the original chart.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 May, 2008 11:06 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Wow, just realized that I was left off of the original chart.

Cycloptichorn


I had you placed right under the "d" in "Idealists."
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 May, 2008 01:02 pm
Ticomaya wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Wow, just realized that I was left off of the original chart.

Cycloptichorn


I had you placed right under the "d" in "Idealists."

Yeah round there would be a good place...

Sorry, Cyclo, I only remembered you when it was already too late, after like the third update or something... Embarrassed

But if I make a new update still, I'll be sure to include you!

I keep coming across people that make me go, duh, why didnt I remember him (or her)?


nimh wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
Not enough in the way-too-tiny Wingnuts bubble, nimh.

Not nearly enough ...

Ha! :P

This reminds me - I never put in JTT, Zippo or talk7200...
0 Replies
 
 

 
Copyright © 2008 able2know :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 11/20/2008 at 10:42:06 :: Active ingredients: LAMP, XHTML, CSS, JavaScript
Top End