0
   

Ben Stien's new movie EXSPELLED

 
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jun, 2008 03:30 pm
This movie didn't even make a big splash in a little pool.

And I think Ben Stein probably hurt his career more than helped it. In the past, his collection of useless knowledge used to make him seem smart, but now he just seems like a fool with a collection of useless trivia that he obviously can't string together into a coherent understanding of basic science. Bueller? Bueller? ... Bueller?
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jun, 2008 03:52 pm
We were talking about just that the other day. Stein, who had billed himself as a top intellect, has lost any credibility that he may have had. Hes a buffoon, and a party to a big lie.

PS, have you seen the movie yet ros? Its just loaded with obvious untruths and half truths that I wonder about Steins ethics as well.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jun, 2008 09:21 pm
farmerman wrote:
PS, have you seen the movie yet ros? Its just loaded with obvious untruths and half truths that I wonder about Steins ethics as well.

No, I haven't seen it. I haven't seen the "Moon Landing Hoax" movies or the "9/11 Conspiracy Theory" movies either, even though I'm sure they are all very entertaining, in that... "people are such idiots" sort of way.
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jun, 2008 09:29 pm
now now. I asked that so I could discuss some of the obvious points in the movie. You must see it just for the enlightenment it offers when the IDjits talk about "critical thin king" .

It needs to be reviewed in classes just to show how the media can manipulate.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jun, 2008 10:00 am
Here is a Collection of video lectures from Rockefeller University. For some reason, Ben Stein wasn't invited to speak.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2008 11:17 am
Whatever happened to Ben Stein? He used to be a "pundit" on several shows. I wonder whether the movie has typecast him into a Neo-Creationist role
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2008 11:34 am
Quote:
"people are such idiots" sort of way.


We all know that disagreement with ros is what defines "idiots". One has to wonder why he keeps labouring the point.

And effemm is back with his "IDjits" which grants permission to go back to AIDs-ers I think. If he can't manage minimal respect is there any reason why we should.
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2008 05:53 pm
If that's the code of ethics you live, by all means use AIDsers to your hearts content. I think you're just looking for an excuse to use the phrase anyways.

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

The Most Boring Movies You've Ever Seen - Discussion by kickycan
Top 100 Worst Rotten Tomatoe Movies - Discussion by Lightwizard
A Movie Scene Quiz - Discussion by Raggedyaggie
Worth Watching Twice - Discussion by Letty
Movie Wisdom - Discussion by Shapeless
The 25 Greatest Legal Movies - Discussion by joefromchicago
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button - Discussion by TilleyWink
15 Top Movies That Should Be On DVD, But Aren't - Discussion by joefromchicago
The National Film Registry - Discussion by Brandon9000
15 GREAT POST-APOCALYPTIC MOVIES - Discussion by djjd62
 
Copyright © 2009 Horizontal Verticals :: Page generated in 0.35 seconds on 11/26/2009 at 01:53:00 Top End