1  
Reply Fri 18 Apr, 2008 06:41 pm
Chumly, in my younger years, I participated in a large amount of testing for synthetic lubricants.

Have you seen any of the research?

I would not use anything else at this point...

RH
0 Replies
 
View Profile Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Apr, 2008 07:10 pm
Was any of this testing done with animals - rabbits perchance?

[IMG]ttp://img214.imageshack.us/img214/8056/rabbitstomachsmmy6.jpg[/IMG]
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Apr, 2008 07:11 pm
Your link failed, and no, it was all done on expensive machinery...
0 Replies
 
View Profile Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Apr, 2008 07:51 pm
http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/8056/rabbitstomachsmmy6.jpg
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2008 09:42 am
Chumly - that hardly seems scientific: whoever wrote it couldn't spell "oesophagus" (or "esophagus"). I trust that means the poor bunnies are safe from whatever sadistic experiment was being planned?!
0 Replies
 
View Profile Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2008 09:57 am
You'll have to talk to Rockhead about that.

He flatly denies involvement with animals, however he admits to testing synthetic lubricants and doing expensive machinery.

His cry-for-help rings clear to my trained ear.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2008 12:28 pm
It's fascinating. All this North American "cry for help" stuff. It comes up all the time. "I'm here for you buddy". "Get help".

It's unheard of in the UK.

It's as if just saying it magically renders the target insane. It must be very reassuring.

The picture looks to me like a surreal artistic expression of someone sat in a posh restaurant.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2008 12:35 pm
"You should get out more and meet people" is another.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2008 03:14 pm
I suppose they are all variants of "you're talking out of your arse" only to be expected in a society where everybody has majored in educational psychology.

A sign of politeness in a genteel society piss-up.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Apr, 2008 08:52 am
Just spotted another "Get help" on the Politics forum.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 May, 2008 03:43 am
Here's another-

Quote:
You are hearing voices again. Get help, you s*** F***
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 May, 2008 06:45 am
This is a new one to me-

Quote:
When was the last time you were with a human?


But I'm not American.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jun, 2008 07:23 am
This is nice-

Quote:
Are you on drugs?

Are you merely self-deluded to an extraordinary degree?

Maybe you're just stupid.

Whatever the case, learning to use spell-check and getting out of the house more often couldn't hurt.


Guess who.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jun, 2008 07:25 am
It's only to be expected I suppose when you have a serious critical thinker and one enjoying post-secondary success.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 01:03 pm
spendius wrote:
It's only to be expected I suppose when you have a serious critical thinker and one enjoying post-secondary success.


Spendius - have you considered hiring an English interpreter? If I may suggest - this distinguished auteur may be available after he finishes with his latest book:

http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/uc/20080604/lpo080603.gif
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jun, 2008 01:07 pm
Pretty good. Like it.
0 Replies
 
View Profile Econdi
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Jun, 2008 07:33 pm
Maths has been used to prove the existence of God. The argument is strictly unmathematical, though. It goes:
x/o = ∞
Thus x= 0 * ∞
This implies that there is an Almighty element (∞) which is able to operate on 0 (the least positive, but greatest negative number) to produce anything, i.e. x.
0 Replies
 
View Profile aperson
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Jun, 2008 02:00 am
raprap wrote:

Now math, those aren't theories, they're theorems and once proved they're always correct within the constraints that started with. But math isn't science--it's just a hammer of science.


I would say science is the embodiment of maths.
0 Replies
 
View Profile aperson
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Jun, 2008 02:16 am
Econdi wrote:
Maths has been used to prove the existence of God. The argument is strictly unmathematical, though. It goes:
x/o = ∞
Thus x= 0 * ∞
This implies that there is an Almighty element (∞) which is able to operate on 0 (the least positive, but greatest negative number) to produce anything, i.e. x.


I cannot understand how people translate mathmatical objects, which not do exist outside our minds, into the real world. Your ∞ is actually called undefined, not infinity as I think you are implying, and it doesn't actually exist in the mathematical sense anyway (a point on an asymptote (n,undefined) does not exist). A better example would have been summing to infinity. But it doesn't matter. Also, I don't think "has been" was the correct tense as I suspect you made this up on the spot. Not that you were the first to think of it, but you did not source it from anywhere or anyone.
0 Replies
 
View Profile Econdi
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Jun, 2008 05:48 am
Source was Aldous Huxley.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

What is a Light Year? - Question by Dorothy Parker
inverted flight - Question by paps
SINGLE CELL FOSSIL - Discussion by hamburger
Does Space Exploration Make Sense? - Question by thegalacticemperor
prehistoric and current animal life - Question by doorsmad
 
  1. able2know
  2. » E = mc^jesus
  3. » Page 6
Copyright © 2009 Horizontal Verticals :: Page generated in 0.38 seconds on 11/26/2009 at 12:13:07 Top End