1
   

New Mexico Abstains

 
 
Reply Thu 20 Dec, 2007 09:15 am
New Mexico abstains from Bush's nanny government abstinence only program.
The state Health Department won't reapply for federal funds to teach abstinence-only sex education, according to department officials.

The state received about $470,000 from the federal government this year that it used to hire contractors for the program, but it won't seek those funds for next year because, officials said, recent research has shown abstinence-only programs are not effective.

Department of Health spokeswoman Deborah Busemeyer cited recently published results from a study by Mathematica Policy Research Inc. that found youth in abstinence-only programs in four U.S. cities "were no more likely ... to have abstained from sex and, among those who reported having had sex, they had similar numbers of sexual partners and had initiated sex at the same mean age."

Busemeyer acknowledged that abstinence-only education can be a controversial topic and stressed that department officials are not against teaching abstinence. They do, however, want to use programs backed by evidence, she said.

"We support programs that give scientific, balanced and complete information to our young people so they accept the information and know what to do with it," Health Secretary Alfredo Vigil said in a prepared release.

Busemeyer also said federal abstinence-only funding was irregular — the feds didn't grant funding in 2006 because they felt the elementary-school pupils the state planned to aim at were too young — and created a problem for contractors that provided the programs. "Providers could never count on getting the funds," she said.

The state still will use approximately $400,000 of its own money for sex education to continue to fund other programs such as Plain Talk, which encourages parents and their kids to talk about sex, and the South Valley Male Involvement Project, an anti-violence and anti-teen pregnancy program in Albuquerque's South Valley.

New Mexico is not alone in not applying for abstinence-only funding, Busemeyer said, adding that about 14 other states didn't apply. She said individual programs still can apply to the federal government for funding.
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Dec, 2007 09:20 am
I always knew that there was a reason that I love that state! Very Happy
0 Replies
 
View Profile Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Dec, 2007 09:26 am
abstinence only program?!?! Thats one of the stupidest ideas Iv'e ever heard.

They Pay people to come up with this stuff?
0 Replies
 
View Profile roger
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Dec, 2007 12:18 pm
Well, bless our hearts for turning down useless money.
0 Replies
 
View Profile dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Dec, 2007 03:44 pm
Re: New Mexico Abstains
dyslexia wrote:
New Mexico abstains from Bush's nanny government abstinence only program.
The state Health Department won't reapply for federal funds to teach abstinence-only sex education, according to department officials.

The state received about $470,000 from the federal government this year that it used to hire contractors for the program, but it won't seek those funds for next year because, officials said, recent research has shown abstinence-only programs are not effective.

Department of Health spokeswoman Deborah Busemeyer cited recently published results from a study by Mathematica Policy Research Inc. that found youth in abstinence-only programs in four U.S. cities "were no more likely ... to have abstained from sex and, among those who reported having had sex, they had similar numbers of sexual partners and had initiated sex at the same mean age."

Busemeyer acknowledged that abstinence-only education can be a controversial topic and stressed that department officials are not against teaching abstinence. They do, however, want to use programs backed by evidence, she said.

"We support programs that give scientific, balanced and complete information to our young people so they accept the information and know what to do with it," Health Secretary Alfredo Vigil said in a prepared release.

Busemeyer also said federal abstinence-only funding was irregular — the feds didn't grant funding in 2006 because they felt the elementary-school pupils the state planned to aim at were too young — and created a problem for contractors that provided the programs. "Providers could never count on getting the funds," she said.

The state still will use approximately $400,000 of its own money for sex education to continue to fund other programs such as Plain Talk, which encourages parents and their kids to talk about sex, and the South Valley Male Involvement Project, an anti-violence and anti-teen pregnancy program in Albuquerque's South Valley.

New Mexico is not alone in not applying for abstinence-only funding, Busemeyer said, adding that about 14 other states didn't apply. She said individual programs still can apply to the federal government for funding.


Well done New Mexico.


What a fucking travesty.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Dec, 2007 03:54 pm
too bad you're all going to hell now.....
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Dec, 2007 11:57 pm
I consider it UNCONSTITUTIONAL
for the federal government to bribe state governments
to conform to its will using the taxes extorted from
the victim states' own citizens.

That is not what the Founders intended,
nor was that subversion of federalism discussed
by those who enacted the 16th Amendment.
David
0 Replies
 
View Profile roger
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Dec, 2007 12:02 am
A bribe. I should have called it that. Come to think of it, that's exactly what it is.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Paul Newman, Hollywood Legend, Is Dying - Discussion by Stray Cat
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
The noose in the news - Discussion by boomerang
Hundreds of Dogs Saved from Puppy Mill - Discussion by BumbleBeeBoogie
Palin and the Christianist tradition - Discussion by InfraBlue
Google Does It Again/ International News - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Plane crashes into Hudson River - Discussion by Region Philbis
 
  1. able2know
  2. » New Mexico Abstains
Copyright © 2009 Horizontal Verticals :: Page generated in 0.36 seconds on 11/25/2009 at 04:01:23 Top End